Edited by Politex


for thadeus & weeze go...

First George W. Bush Site on the Web

From Austin, Texas, Home of Candidate Bush

www.bushwatch.com

"This nonprofit, nonaffiliated site has up-to-the-minute news on George W. Bush's
political progress, plus links to many news sources and political sites."
U.S. News and World Report

"Knows just about everything there is to know about George W. Bush."
Christian Science Monitor

News sources that have provided a link to Bush Watch for its readers include
New York Times, MSNBC, and London (UK) Telegraph.

"Skeptical venue with summations of news coverage, plus commentary."
Washington Post

"Amusing Texas-based site with lots of local flavor."
New Hampshire.Com


Here's how you can contact Governor Bush
www.bushsucks.com



to bush sunday funnies

Bush Watch Archives
APRIL, '99, II
APRIL, '99
MARCH '99, II
MARCH '99
FEBRUARY '99
JANUARY '99
DECEMBER '98
Specials
BUSHGATE
BUSH WHO?
APRIL FOOLS
TWELVE DAZE
BUSH HOG DAY
MOJOTOONS
Bush Web Sites
BUSH '98
BUSHFAX
BUSH FAMILY
BUSH 2000 NET
BUSH COMMITTEE
SKELETON CLOSET
GEORGE and MORE
ELECT THE PRESIDENT
BUSH QUESTIONNAIRE
NEBRASKANS FOR BUSH
SOME BUSH '00 MONEY

Gore Web Sites
OFFICIAL GORE 2000
GORE WATCH.NET
VETS FOR GORE
DISABLED FOR GORE
BRADLEY FOR PREZ
SKELETON CLOSET
NO GORE
NOT GORE

Presidency 2000
Politics 1
Elections U.S.A.
Everything 2000
White House 2000




TIMES WONDERS IF GOVERNMENT WILL SHUT DOWN BUSH WATCH. With both Clinton and Dole owing the government at least hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign funding violations, a Sunday New York Times story by REBECCA FAIRLEY RANEY indicates that most grassroots presidential campaign sites appear to be in violation of FEC campaign funding laws. "Federal regulators' current interpretation of the law, which makes individual Web publishers the equivalent of political action committees, was issued as an FEC advisory opinion in November....Under those laws, which have been interpreted by Federal regulators to apply to Web sites just as they apply to television ads, even lone advocates are required to post disclaimers that identify who built their Web sites and to file expenditure reports with the Federal Election Commission to account for donations to campaigns." According to poli-sci prof Michael Cornfield, of George Washington University, "formal distinctions need to be made between political professionals and individual advocates. Under the current interpretation, he said, 'any citizen who wants to express himself on a campaign has to have an accountant and a lawyer. It's just awful. That should not hold water in a country where the citizens are asked to educate themselves.'" However, there are two loopholes to the FEC edict. First, "In the current interpretation of the law, Web publishers working independently of campaigns do not have to file disclosure forms if they spend less than $250 on the site. However, tallying the costs can be complicated. In a summary of its advisory opinion, the FEC reported that costs include 'the domain name registration fee, the amount invested in the hardware (computer and peripherals) that created the Web site and the utility costs associated with creating and maintaining the site.'" Ah-huh. Then there's the crank loophole, which allows folks to complain to their heart's content, providing they don't tell anyone how to vote: "Sites that engage even in strong criticism, like Bush Watch, or intense parody, like All Gore, are less likely to run afoul of election law because they do not specifically direct people to vote a certain way," Raney wrote. So, remember, folks, I can't ask you to vote for Bush and I can't ask you to vote for Gore. Who says the government isn't cracking down on corrupt campaign funding practices? 5/18/99


OUR BUSH VP CANDIDATE NOT ON THE ROVE URL LIST. Last Wednesday in The Politics1 Report, Ron Gunzburger reported that back in February Bush guru Karl Rove had sucked up four Bush-VP URL's among his 60-odd domain purchases. Interestingly, Bush/Whitman (NJ), Bush/Pataki (NY), Bush/Engler (MI), and Bush/Ridge (PA) tickets all provide moderate GOP Gov's for VP's. We think Engler is an excellent speaker and a powerful presence, but if George were to choose between these four, he would probably go with Ridge. ( We mentioned Ridge some months ago in this context.) However, back on April 1 we reported Bush's choice for VP. Our story is reprinted below for those who missed it at the time, and for those who didn't, we know you'd want to read it again.

"PRESIDENTIAL RUNNING MATE SELECTED, THEN REJECTED, BY BUSH.(Rooters) In a bold decision that didn't appear to come as a surprise to the crack, necktied members of the Governor's security staff, George W. Bush selected his vice-presidential running mate yesterday evening. Then he changed his mind. In the photo on your left (not shown), the GOP presidential candidate is seen consoling his on-again, off-again selectee, seated behind the white column in a state of shock. A nearby reporter overheard Bush saying, "That's why I like to pre-announce announcements of my informal announcements to be made prior to my off-the-cuff announcements that preceed my announcement of the formal announcement! I'll never do that again!" Later, the Governor's spokesperson said next week's schedule is filled with visitors to the Governor's Mansion bringing petitions of support for a supportable candidate who will be in a position to offer support to find a viable candidate that Bush could support. 5/17/99


SILLY SEASON UPON US. ONE VOTER = DEMS FOR BUSH? Another hot-off-the-press Bush site started up Wednesday, "Democrats for Bush." So new it doesn't even have an "under construction" sign and so clunky it looks like the real thing, the only name on the site is someone's e-mail address. Perhaps the person who put up the website will provide his credentials as a Democrat at a later date; say, after the 2000 elections, and perhaps he's willing to give us the names of any friends who see themselves as donkies. Meanwhile, skepticism is the order of the day. The "Dems for Bush" reminds us of another grassroots group for Bush during the recent gubernatorial campaign: five El Paso women calling themselves "Housekeepers for Bush." The difference is this new site doesn't really read like it's being backed by members of either party. Perhaps its position will become clearer at a later date as it provides more documentation. Meanwhile, the supposed voter behind it seems to be having fun, which is a lot more than could be said about some of the political sites out there. 5/16/99


NEW SITE ON THE 2000 BUSH WEBRING MAKES WAVES. Calling itself Virtually Bush on the unofficial Bush websites list, this new kid on the block started up with a bang, publishing a supposed Bush press release announcing "Amnesty 2000, a bold new policy initiative to free all 'grown ups' from federal prisons." 5/15/99


BUSH SITTING ATOP DIRECTIONLESS ROCKET ABOUT TO BLAST OFF! Some of those bad guys in Washington still see our Waldo as "an untested, oversold hothead," according to Howard Fineman in the May 17th issue of Newsweek. "'He's ripe for the picking,' said Charlie Cook, dean of the D.C. political touts." And them's the kind words. With reports of Dubya cozying up to GOP House leaders Dick Armey and Tom DeLay, a top adviser to Gore said, "That's Bush's first big screw-up. The country hates those two, and we're going to staple the three of them together." 5/14/99


POLITEX: WILL BUSH BUDGET BOMB HIT THE WRONG TARGET? Seeming to have the Kosovo Chinese Embassy fiasco in the back of her mind, Republican State Comptroller Carole Keeton Rylander said Tuesday that the badly needed and overdue state budget will be reported to the legislature as soon as she has "a very accurate road map." Putting herself in the cockpit, Rylander went on to say that she didn't want to "overshoot the runway" when she delivers her budget bomb. As Politex estimated on Sunday (see below), it appears that the Comptroller is going to report around a billion dollars in additional funding. That, coupled with the $500 million plus the Dems had previously suggested giving to Bush for his property tax cut, should satisfy the Guv's desire to give wealthy property owners a financial windfall and the Dem's desire to get Texas closer to the national average for teachers' pay. George's initial plan was $2 billion in property tax cuts and no specific funding for teachers. But all eyes right now are on "Tuff Grandma." (Her name, not ours.)

The Dems are turning up the heat, trying to keep Rylander honest. They know she'd love to wait until the last minute before saying, "Bombs away!" That way, she hopes George would be the beneficiary of her largess, since he's not going to be tempted to settle for less in the meantime. There's little doubt that communication between the rapid-talking lady and the laconic Guv is taking place on a daily basis. But the Dems know how the game is played, so they're waiting, too. Dem House Ed Committee Chairman Paul Sandler said this is the latest in the three Bush sessions that the budget count has come in. Meanwhile, his committee simply is not meeting: "No reason to meet without money," he said. Kevin Bailey, another Dem House chairman said, "We don't know if it's intentional or if (the rookie Comptroller) is just incapable of figuring out the amount." As we have indicated earlier in the week, Rylander has spent many years in political leadership positions, so it's doubtful the problem is inexperience.

Talking about leadership, the Dems have described Dubya's leadership skills in the matter as "absent." One has taken to calling the Guv "Waldo," of "Where's Waldo?" fame. Even the GOP members of the lege are growing restless. A Texas House insider has described the feelings of many Republican legislaters to us: "I can tell you that the Republican leadership is very, very frustrated with the Gov's lack of an agenda and an unwillingness to take a stand on anything. There is no motivation on the GOP's part to move anything. So all they can do, and they do this on a daily basis, is counter with floor amendments to water down the stuff they don't like." The frustration came out on the floor the other day when renagade Republicans proposed and passed more sales tax cuts, with the surprised approval of the Dems and the clear disapproval of the Republican leadership. Even the Republican Senate Finance Committee Chairman, Bill Ratliff has gotten on the growing bandwagon of dissatisfaction, saying if he doesn't have Rylander's budget by Friday, "it'll be too late." It appears that there's collateral damage even before the budget bomb has been dropped. 5/13/99


NO ROOM FOR BUSH STUNNERS ON POLITICAL GEMS LIST. During this time of the 100 best this or that of the century, the L.A. Time's Ron Brownstein has selected the 10 most eloquent political one-liners. Needless to say, nothing attributed to George even made the list of runner-ups. The over-all winner had to be JFK, who figures in three of the top ten: "Ich Bin Ein Berliner" and "Ask not what the country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country," both scripted by Kennedy speech-writer Ted Sorenson, and Lloyd Bentsen's prepared-in-advance rejoinder to Dan Quayle during their 1988 debate: "I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy." In fairness to G-Dub, he's recently hired some new wordsmiths, so there's still time to drop that memorable bon mot somewhere along the campaign trail. In the meantime, we're working on a top-ten list of bad political one-liners. The competition is fierce but, as you might imagine, our George is right in there with his own brand of bombastic bombs. Space does not permit a full accounting, so here are just three of his golden moldies: "There is a lot of speculation and I guess there is going to continue to be a lot of speculation until the speculation ends" ; "I hope to show Hispanics that Republicans do have a heart, but I also want to send a message to people from around the country as to how to pick up the Hispanic vote" ; and "I propose that every city have a telephone number 119 --for dyslexics who have an emergency." 5/12/99 (This just in as we were getting ready to post this piece. Bush quoted in today's DMN: ""After six years, or five years, or actually 4 1/2 years to get it correct - 4 1/2 years of having been - actually four years and five months - of having been in office, my enthusiasm and optimism about life has not waned," he said.)


DUBYA FLUBS JOB INTERVIEW FOR PREZ POSITION. Bush undoubtedly took a course in personnel management as part of his Harvard MBA, but yesterday on Good Morning, America Diane Sawyer interviewed him about the upcoming prez position, and his performance indicated he needs to brush up on his job interview skills. First of all, when someone asks you why you want the job, you're supposed to explain how you would benefit your employer. George didn't do that. Instead, he indicated that he spends time worrying about problems that either do not exist or that he lacks the skills or inclination to fix: "I worry about the future of America. I worry about whether we’ll be prosperous. I worry about whether the world will be peaceful. I really worry, though, that people might be left behind as we head into the 21st century."

Then there's Dubya's tendency throughout the interview to repeat himself and to ignore the question asked, either because he didn't understand the question or because he didn't have an acceptable answer: SAWYER: People have said even though there are laws on the books about prosecuting parents (for the crimes of their children), that it isn’t being done. Do you want more? GOV. BUSH: Well, we’ve got ample law in the state of Texas to do such things. Really what I want is parents to say my most important job is to be a good, loving mother or dad. SAWYER: Mrs. Clinton has said it’s time for the American people to write their senators and congressman and say buck the gun lobby. Do you want Americans to write their senators and say that? GOV. BUSH: I don’t know what that means. I do know that mothers and dads have got to say and understand the most important job they will ever have—they will ever have—is to love their children.

Dubya broke another job interview rule when he gave answers that were contradicted by his job vita. For example, when Sawyer asked him if he was for instant checks on gun show sales and pushing for it, he said he was, but recent facts in his dossier suggest otherwise. Similarly, when Sawyer asked him if he were for mandatory safety locks on guns, he said he was for voluntary safety locks. Bush's vita indicates that he's also for voluntary pollution control, and facts indicate that approach to cleaning up the environment has failed miserably. (In case you're interested, we're for voluntary free gas at the pumps.)

Sawyer broke a job interview rule of her own by asking Bush about his personal life. That's a no-no according to Federal law, but George didn't seem to mind answering it, since he had an answer that all of us had heard over and over and over: "20 to 30 years ago, I made mistakes. But what people need to know about me is that I’ve learned from my mistakes... People can float every rumor they want and people can try to destroy the reputation of candidates, but as we move ahead into the 21st century, it’s necessary—it’s necessary for somebody to say the past is the past, judge me for what I am today." Since George stopped drinking 12 years ago, not 20 or 30, folks have really wondered what in the world he's talking about, since he brought up the matter of a "wild youth" in the first place. Interestingly, he contends his "wild youth" continued into his mid-thirties.

A job interviewer might conclude that the guy's a nut and paranoid to boot. He makes a big deal apologizing about something he did sometime between his childhood and his mid-thirties but refuses to identify what he's talking about and then turns around and blames Washington and the media for trying to "destroy somebody's reputation" because reporters are asking for clarification when he's the one who brought it up in the first place. Sawyer left it at that, telling Bush that his answer is "going to leave the implication, of course, that you did drugs."

Looking over the full transcript of Dubya's first TV job interview for prez, one could fairly conclude that this candidate wouldn't be invited back for a second interview for such an important job if not for the fact that his father has some pull with the higher-ups in the company and the guy being interviewed controls quite a bit of its stock. 5/11/99

POLITEX: GOP NEEDS BUSH PRIMARY TO CHECK SIBLING CHOICE. Paul Gigot, the younger, taller, more conservative half of the PBS team of Shields and Gigot, said Friday in the WSJ that Republicans have a Southern governor, the son of a recent President, whose legislative program is presently being passed like gangbusters. His name's Jeb Bush. Meanwhile, "as one Republican puts it, (George) Bush is ahead in the polls now mainly because he is ahead in the polls. Republicans hear he's got talent, and they're desperate to win, so they pile their hopes onto his poll numbers....One worry is that Mr. Bush has prospered politically in Texas more because of his personal charisma than his ability to sell ideas." Gigot implies that this is exactly what brought George's father down against Clinton: "The governor's presidential opponents may remind primary voters that another George Bush made the mistake of thinking politics was mainly personal.... Republicans deserve to know, in short, if George W. Bush the politician is like his father, or more like his mother and brother." 5/10/99

HOW DUBYA WILL ORCHESTRATE A TAX CUT BY MAY 31. In an ad hominem headline in the Statesman on Friday, Dave McNeeley said everyone's "Waiting for Rylander to Sing." Carole Keeton Rylander, Texas' own portly pepperpot whose speech pattern is as rapid as an AK-41, happens to be in the catbird seat right now as Texas Comptroller. Rylander is in charge of telling Bush and the legislature how much money the state has to spend in the next two years, but she's not saying. Republicans say she's just being careful as an inexperienced beginner, having taken over the job from Dem John Sharp in the last election. But Rylander's no babe in the woods, serving as mayor of Austin and head of the Texas Railroad Commission before moving up the political food chain. Before ex-Comptroller Sharp left, he squirreled away $300-$500 million for the next session, as Comptrollers usually do for political leverage, and declared a surplus of $6.3 billion. (Of course, there really is no surplus in Texas if you figure out budgets the way the other states do, as Rylander's Dem opponent noted throughout the campaign, but no one wanted to listen to such negative nonsense, and he lost.)

Getting back to Rylander, the politician who ran as "One Tuff Grandma!" got into office in January and almost immediately decided that Sharp's estimated surplus was $700 million too high. So much for being an inexperienced beginner. Now, Rylander has $1.1 billion extra to declare whenever she chooses. (Work with me, here.) That plus whatever she can come up with after the state revenue report is due May 15 could very well total enough to give Bush $1.5-1.75 billion for his property tax proposal, which would be close enough to his requested $2 billion to preclude a special session of the legislature in June, providing the Dems are satisfied with their cut. Right now, the Dem-led House committee has $3 billion to spend on teacher pay, property cuts, etc., and with that scenario the Bush property tax cut could be as low as $500 million, the price of a burger a month for the average home owner. Earlier in the session Bush tried to get more money with a bill that would have raided the Workers' Compensation Fund. No dice. His latest strategy was unveiled last week when he started the rumor through the Capitol that he would call a special session. (Reported here last weekend.) By Wednesday it became reported national fact with a laid-back George saying he wouldn't mind hanging out in Austin for another month to avoid the sweat of a primary campaign and to leave with his presidential tax message intact.

But no one really wants a special session, most of all Bush. As Clay Robison says in today's Houston Chronicle, it would be "at best a calculated risk." And since the special session could include revived versions of dead bills like educational vouchers, the Dems are not happy about the prospect. Which takes us back to Rylander. She won out over Hobby in a very close race due to the backing of two men: George Bush, who provided political cover, and "Sugar Daddy" Leininger who provided financial cover. Leininger has become point man for the voucher movement in Texas, and it wouldn't be a surprise to learn that Rylander is caught between the desires of these two powerful men. (We suspect the deal is already taking place. In the last few weeks Bush has repeated that, as President, he would support Ed Vouchers on the Fed level.) Meanwhile, the Dems in the House are saying they can't move bills without the Comptroller's final numbers and Rylander would like to wait until the very last minute (May 31) to find more money, at which time it would go to Bush's plan to decrease property taxes, other big money bills having been reduced or killed in the meantime because, catch-22, no one knows how much money the state has to spend. What we're seeing, then, is an elaborate political game of chicken, with all sides asking Rylander to "please lay the golden egg." (AAS 5/7/99) 5/9/99


GEORGE CAN ESCAPE THE GOP JUNGLE BY DOING THE CLINTON. Just as Bill Clinton saved the Dems by wresting the party from the left, Dubya can do the same for the Grand Old Party by taking it away from the "troglodytes" on the right. So says ex-Clinton aide Paul Begala in the May issue of "George." While he has no "big ideas" and offers no "broad challenges," the Guv can earn earn a "social promotion" to presidential candidacy simply by thumbing his nose at the "flat earth Republicans" on the right, says Begala: "Now, I realize that easing off on gay bashing, paying a living wage, and not selling firearms to criminals may seem like pretty tame stuff to you. But this is the Republican party we're talking about--a group run by some of the finest minds of the twelfth century. So even these mild proposals will probably seem too radical for the GOP." 5/8/99


TEXAS GOVERNOR DEFENDS BABY BOOMERS. Everytime someone asks our Governor Bush about his apparently checkered past in the context of his presidential run, he changes the topic to someone who isn't even running for office, Baby Boomers. We've been unable to locate Boomers, but we think she might be a lady friend of the Governor's when he was single. During an interview with Boston TV station WCVB in Austin recently, he was asked if he had any skeleton in his closet that would preclude him serving as president. (Governor Bush, not the skeleton.) Ever modest, Bush shifted the reporter's attention to Ms. Boomers: "Twenty or 30 years ago, when I was a single man, I made mistakes. But listen, I've learned from my mistakes. That's what Baby Boomers must explain to America. Baby Boomers have to say, (sic) 'We've made mistakes, but we've learned from our mistakes and now we're mature enough adults to be responsible parents and responsible leaders.'" Although the Governor seems to be indicating he made mistakes with Ms. Boomers, he didn't provide any details for the reporter. During another part of the interview, Governor Bush discussed one of my relatives. When asked if he was worried if someone like Ms. Boomers would come out of his past and embarrass him, he replied, "D.C. Politex says, 'Let's just say things about people. Let's try to destroy their reputation.'" Now, D. C. and I grew up together, and I'm here to tell you that he doesn't tell untruths and he doesn't talk behind people's backs. Bush is wrong about him, plain and simple. And D.C. never met Baby Boomers, to the best of my knowledge, so I don't know why the Governor brought him up. George W. Bush concluded the interview on a somber note: "People are going to have to learn to think in order to be able to realize the American dream. And the danger is that some will be left behind." Many Texans think Bush's presidential dreams are leaving them behind through his self-serving legislative choices, and they're feeling pretty somber about that. 5/7/99


ENTREPRENEUR WITH URL FIXATION GOBBLES UP 60 ANTI-BUSH SITES. Guess we're lucky we owned all three "Bush Watch" domains before a certain Harvard MBA shelled out over $4,000 to purchase cyber-rights to 60 URL's deemed to have anti-Bush connotations. To find out who we're talking about, click on bushsucks.com, bushsux.org, bushblows.com, or georgebushbites.com. What about bushdumbmove.com? (TIME 5/10) 5/6/99


GUV "NOT RULING OUT THE USE OF GROUND TROOPS." Last Saturday we reported that the latest rumor around the halls of the Capitol was that "George wants an excuse to call a special session of the legislature during the month of June to further avoid going out on the primary hustings." Yesterday an unnamed legislator quoted Dubya as saying, "My front porch strategy is working well enough that I may as well stay here for the summer." Another nameless lawmaker used his thumb and forefinger as a visual aid and said, "We're this close to calling a special session." Presumably, George would call a special session to bail out his floundering property tax bill, part of his showcase educational package. All of this was news to the Bush spokesman who answered reporters' questions: "The governor believes we have ample time to enact significant tax cuts and education reform between now and May 31." A spokesman for the Bush exploratory committee indicated otherwise: "He's not making any threats, but he's not giving away any political weapons. He's not ruling out the use of ground troops." However, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rene Oliveira, D-Brownsville said yesterday, "all sides are agreeing that it's in no one's interest to have a special session. The numbers don't get any better in a special session. The financial issues, the teacher pay issues, the money available, don't get any better." Our feeling is George would have more to lose than he would gain by holding a special session. The last thing he wants to do right now is to call the nation's attention to his leadership failures and legislative inadequacies. Better to count on his spin machine to clean up his muddy tracks when he puts Texas in his rear view mirror. (HC,WP 5/5) 5/5/99


BUSH EARNS GRADE OF 52% IN CARRYING OUT OWN LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE. From his gubernatorial campaign last fall through his "state of the state" address in January, the Guv has laid out his legislative plan of action upon which he has wanted to be judged when he hits the presidential campaign trail this summer. His ten top partisan proposals/oppositions have been graded up to 10 points each, the criteria being his record of success, based on what he said he wanted to accomplish. With a month to go in the session, he's earned a failing grade of 52 out of 100.
1. Oil and Gas Tax Breaks. The Bush bill to suspend severance taxes on low-volume wells when the price drops has been signed into law. 10 Points
2. Air Pollution. The Bush bill requesting grandfathered polluters to voluntarily follow emission reduction guidelines has passed the Senate and a House committee and is expected to be signed into law with few changes. 10 Points.
3. Parental Notification on Abortions. Although this Bush bill has passed the Senate, it's tied up in the House. While bill now allows a "bypass" of parents by having a judge approve, many judges get elected with anti-abortion positions, indicating that the a health professional or a social service worker may be needed as a non-political "bypass." Although the bill will pass, "bypass" language will be included. 8 Points.
4. End Social Promotions. This is another Bush bill that everyone seemingly has gotten behind, but although it passed the Senate in mid-February, it has yet to make it through the House because the Dems are working out programs to to help students pass. Money for needed programs such as mandatory kindergarten and smaller classes for failing students has taken cash from Bush-backed programs elsewhere. 7 Points.
5. Children's Health Insurance Program. While the Bush bill wanted to hold the line at covering children in households 150% over the poverty level, the Senate has agreed to some children to 200% and the House has covered all children to 200%. As a point of comparison, both California and New Jersey use at least 300% over poverty. Keep in mind that the Feds give matching funds. 5 Points.
6. Hate Crimes. To Bush, all crime is hate crime. To put it another way, Dubya believes no crime is hate crime. Most Texans and the House disagree with him. The GOP-led Senate is working on a way to delete "sexual preference" from the hate crimes bill. 5 Points.
7. Business Tax Cuts. In the present booming Texas economy, Bush finds it necessary to provide R+D franchise tax cuts that economists in his own state government specifically do not recommend. A compromise bill came out of the Senate, limiting the tax cuts to 92 of 254 counties, those with the lowest per capita income. 4 Points.
8. Property Tax Cuts. This bill was given top priority by Bush. It's passed the Senate and is presently being considered by the House, but the $2 billion proposed by the Governor has shrunk to $500 million in committee, making the cut only meaningful to property conglomerates and awarding the average homeowner the price of a burger a month. (A coke and fries have been lost during the last few weeks.) 3 Points.
9. Teacher Pay Raise. Since teachers did not support Bush or vouchers in the last election, the Bush plan for teachers was no plan at all. During the campaign he said money would go to school districts and how it was spent was none of his business. The Senate was unable to pass such an education bill, supposedly the centerpiece of his beginning presidential campaign. Presently in House committee, the $1.5 billion Bush lost in property taxes is earmarked for teachers' pay. 0 Points.
10. Educational Vouchers. While the Guv is keeping a low profile on this bill, both he and Lt. Gov. Perry are deeply beholden to the voucher folks for their campaign funding. Bush has gone on record in support of the bill and spoke at their major rally on the Capitol steps early in the session. Although the plan has been scaled back from 9 urban districts to 2, it has little hope of passage. Perry has threatened to attach it to some other legislation. The Dems say do it and the state budget gets pulled. Bush can't afford to have that happen. 0 Points.
Note: The Electirc Deregulation Bill is another major, partisan bill backed by Bush, but it has been rewritten and revised and its status is uncertain. Too early to grade.
Total = 52 Points. 5/4/99


BUSH LIKES DEATH PENALTY LAW "THE WAY IT IS." 73% of Texans disagreee with Bush: the state should not execute the mentally retarded. "Jimmie Arthur believed that he was sentenced to death because he couldn't read. He diligently tried to learn so he could earn his general equivalency diploma because he thought he would get a reprieve if he was successful. Morris Mason asked a legal aid attorney what he should wear to his funeral because he couldn't understand that he would not be alive after his execution." 5/3/99


DUBYA'S '99 RECORD HIDDEN BY MARKETING OF PERSONALITY. While most Texans approve of the Guv's job performance, nearly half had no idea of what he's accomplished, according to a recent Scripps Howard Texas Poll. "George Bush has been successful marketing himself as a personality and a responsible leader independently of championing particular issues....(He's) a fellow who has been able to create the impression that somebody who is capable and caring is in charge," says UT political pundit Bruce Buchanan. One wonders how long it will take for the facts to catch up to the "impressions" created by "marketing."
Headline: "Bush against banning death penalty for retarded." Bush: "I like the law the way it is right now."
"He was just as adamant about preserving the suspect status quo on death penalty clemency to keep the 'emotion' (and the public) out of the process. And during his first term he granted fewer pardons than any of his predecessors during a comparable period.."
Headline: "Bush opposes adoptions by gays."
"The governor spoke enthusiastically in favor or premarital sex abstinence ("I think it's cool.") while ducking questions about whether he had practiced it."
"On a topic where his public support might actually do some good--a state health insurance plan for children and teens--he stayed notably mute."
"Not a word about the state's crucial, troubled, higher education system in his "state of the state" address."
While that address included a line about protecting business from Y2K lawsuits, Bush said nothing to the citizens to assure them that he was taking a leadership position in dealing with the problem and that he was taking care of his state responsibilities
"He announced support for an obscure, unnecessary, and controversial proposal to give religious institutions more parking-lot paving rights and property rights than other folks."
"He warmly supported a distracting school voucher proposal even though it is passionately opposed by many of the state's major religious, education, and civil liberties groups." Polls show that the majority of Texans don't want vouchers.
He allowed "state troopers this month (to) end the time-honored tradition of free-speech demonstrating just outside the governor's mansion."
"The governor's plan for Texas, home of more tons of industrial pollutants than any othe state, does not include any crackdown on the hundreds of plants enjoying a 29-year-old exemption from Clean Air Act standards."
The first and last bill he's signed into law thus far as part of his campaign program is a tax benefit to his oil bidness buddies.
His pretend support of a gun-show bill ranks with his Kosovo blunder.
His campaign promise was $2 billion in property taxes and nothing in teachers' pay. Right now, it's nearing just the opposite.
Of course, with a month left in the present legislative session, Governor George W. Bush has ample time to actively support some legislation that would do us proud. But why should he, when polls indicate that a substantial number of voters support him without having any idea of what he's accomplished? (AAS 4/30) 5/2/99


BUSH PREZ DISH HEATS UP AUSTIN. Although Texas is at the bottom in social services and per capita government spending, it's right at the top in political gossip. "Back when he was speaker of the House, Gib Lewis used to joke that someone could start a rumor on the forth floor of the Texas Capitol and race it to the basement--and lose. The rumor would already be there, probably magnified." Thus, when Austin Statesman reporter Dave McNeely told Bush guru Karl Rove about the latest Bush rumor earlier this month, he was given a curt reply: "ridiculous!" The dish was that Dubya would resign on May 31 at the end of the legislative session "to have more time to campaign for president without the distraction of governing the country's second-largest state." Most Capitol observers could have told McNeely not to have gone to the trouble of asking the horse's mouth. George hasn't let the duties of Governor distract him from his presidential plunge thus far, so why should he change now? His aides, his spinners, and a working auto-pen signature machine is all he really needs , and he can then tell the nation that his skill at delegating authority is a qualification for the presidency.

But those pesky rumors! Shoot one down and there's another to take its place. The latest that's zipping around the corridors of the Capitol is that George wants an excuse to call a special session of the legislature during the month of June to further avoid going out on the primary hustings. One observer explained: "If you consider Dubya's current position in the polls by not campaigning, you could say that his strategy has been quite successful. A special session would allow him to point to his state duties as the reason he can't yet get out of Texas for another month or so to work the early primary states. He could continue to selectively refuse to address presidential questions because he is 'concentrating' on issues here at home. It is widely accepted that the longer he can put off campaigning, the longer he stays in the lead." Meanwhile, his growing war chest might discourage some of his opponents from continuing their run. Word is at the end of June he plans to announce that he's collected $15 million. Rove would undoubtedly call this rumor "ridiculous" as well, but it's the product of folks who wonder who George thinks he's fooling. As observers in and out of the media have been saying for months, sooner or later Bush has to come out of Texas and prove that he can take some primary punches. To combine boxing and politics, George can run, but he can't hide! (AAS 4/9) 5/1/99

Editorial Policy: All entries are dated and documented as needed.
Text (c) PoliTex. Permission of author required for reprinting.
Duration of working link not under our control.
Updated daily at various times.
Site consultation by Weasel Ware.


links
The Politex Poll
Your Favorite "Bush Wars" Action Figure?

Karl Rove
Dad
Laura
Jeb
Tom DeLay


Current Results

AP Bush Updates
Nebraska Archives
Wash. Post Archives
Editorial Archives

G. W. Bush =
W.
II
Two
Too
Guv
G.W.
G-Dub
G-Bub
Shrub
Dubya
Junior
Bushie
Wobbly
Guv-Dub
Bushbush
Bushworth
George II
Nacho Man
George Two
George Too
Boy George
King George
Prince George
Walker, Tex. Ranger